Compensation Structures for Medical Practices Part 2 - Compliance with Stark and Anti-Kickback Laws


March 13, 2012     By Matt Dickstein - Business Attorney

PhoneCall the Attorney at (510) 796-9144

Law Firm in Fremont: Matt Dickstein - Business Attorney
Today, I briefly outline the legal requirements that apply when a group medical practice pays compensation to its members. My prior newsletter explained compensation plans from a non-legal perspective. This newsletter talks about the law, specifically, medical practice compensation plans under California and federal referral laws (Stark and Anti-Kickback).
In general, a group medical practice pays its physicians in some combination of three ways: (1) salary, (2) productivity payments, that is, productivity bonuses or shares in profits or collections, (3) corporate dividends. Let’s start right away with how the referral laws treat salaries.

Salary

Salary is the first element of a compensation plan. Under Stark, salaries to a group’s physician employees must be:

1. For identifiable services,
2. In amount consistent with fair market value without taking into account any DHS referrals, and
3. Paid pursuant to a bona-fide agreement that would be commercially reasonable even if the physician never makes any referrals to the group.

If the group meets these conditions, it may pay productivity bonuses or a percentage of collections to the employee-physician for services the physician personally performs. Make sure you have a solid employment agreement that clearly shows its compliance with this Stark rule.

Productivity Payments - Bonuses / Shares in Profits or Collections

Productivity payments are the second element of a compensation structure. First and foremost, to make productivity payments, your group must meet the Stark definition of a “group practice.” In this short article, I cannot cover the entire definition of a group practice. I’ll focus only on those aspects of the rule that govern our chosen topic – compensation. Suffice it to say that meeting the definition of a group practice is essential for many reasons beyond making productivity payments, for example, making internal DHS referrals per the Stark exception for in-office ancillary services.

A group practice may pay profit-shares, percentages of collections and productivity bonuses that factor in services that the physician personally performed (including “incident to” services in some cases), for example, a physician’s total patient encounters or other relative value units. A group may also pay bonuses or shares based on other factors, e.g. years of experience or management services. A group practice may not pay a physician directly based on DHS referrals.

Most compensation plans make productivity payments based on a balancing of factors that reflect the culture of the medical group. Some groups are “eat what you kill,” meaning a majority of compensation relates to revenue personally generated by a physician. Others reward team building activities; see my last newsletter for more discussion of this topic.

Lastly, to make productivity payments under the Stark law, the group must have a written
compensation plan for its members. Usually you see the plan as an attachment to board of director resolutions, but you might also see it in shareholders agreements or even the bylaws. The compensation plan must track the Stark law without deviation.

Dividends and Other Per-Capita Shares in Profits

Dividends are the third element of a compensation plan. The group may pay per-capita shares of overall group profits, for example per-share dividends, provided that the share of profit is not directly related to DHS referrals. Dividends are straight-forward because a per-share dividend rarely has any relation to referrals.

Enough already. The Stark and Kickback laws are terribly complex, so please get competent legal help for your compensation plan. Call me if you want to talk more.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Matt Dickstein, Business Attorney
Matt Dickstein, Business Attorney, provides business legal services in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Silicon Valley, California, including San Jose, Palo Alto, San Francisco, Oakland, Hayward, Fremont, Walnut Creek, Pleasanton and Sacramento. Since 1994, I have been representing businesses of all types, big and small. I handle business transactions, corporations & LLCs, real estate ventures, professional practices, and franchises.

Copyright Matt Dickstein - Business Attorney
More information about Matt Dickstein - Business Attorney

View all articles published by Matt Dickstein - Business Attorney

Disclaimer: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific technical or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.