Controlled Substance Law

Controlled Substances Act (CSA)



What is Controlled Substance Law?

Controlled substance law consists of prohibitions against the unauthorized possession of drugs that the government has determined to be dangerous, habit-forming, or otherwise not appropriate for use without a prescription. Statutes setting forth these laws have been enacted at all levels of government, including most local municipalities. Violations can result in criminal fines and incarceration. The severity of the penalty in any given case is determined primarily by the quantity of controlled substances involved and whether the offender has past convictions for similar crimes.

At the federal level, Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in 1970 in an effort to categorize regulated drugs based on their potential for abuse, as well as the benefits they provide from a medical standpoint. States have enacted their own schedules in much the same fashion. Drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and many other street and prescription drugs are placed within one of five “schedules.” The most harmful substances appear in Schedule I, and the rest appear in descending order accordingly.

By placing all controlled substances into schedules, legislatures can then enact criminal statutes that incorporate the schedules by reference. This avoids the need to list all substances covered by a particular law within the text of the law itself. It also provides a convenient means for updating drug laws within a jurisdiction all at once, as individual drugs can be added or removed from the schedules as necessary without the need to amend all the other drug laws. For example, in the year 2000, Congress added the date-rape drug “GHB” to Schedule I, thereby automatically making it illegal under every federal drug law that references that schedule.

Criminal Charges and Statutory Issues

While law enforcement agencies carry out the investigation and apprehension of alleged controlled substance law offenders, the prosecuting attorney will have the final say in charging decisions. This discretion is important because the same conduct can often form the basis for a variety of criminal charges and corresponding punishments. Consider a case in which the defendant is caught giving marijuana to an acquaintance. A prosecutor could potentially charge the case as simple possession, possession with intent to distribute, delivery, trafficking, conspiracy to commit trafficking, and so on.

Once the nature of the charges is known, the defendant and his or her attorney must carefully review the language of the criminal statute. The precise wording of the statute is extremely important. Each portion should be considered individually, and thought of as a separate element that the state must prove in order to convict. In addition to the identity and weight of the substance recovered from the defendant, there may be issues as to the defendant’s knowledge of the substance, or whether the substance was actually in the defendant’s control.

Fourth Amendment Concerns

The fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbids the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. Law enforcement can only intrude upon an individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy under narrow circumstances, especially when acting without a search warrant. Controlled substance cases almost always trigger search and seizure concerns because at some point in the investigation, officers will be invading the suspect’s privacy in order to locate and take possession of the drugs.

In fact, the government can violate a suspect’s fourth amendment rights in a number of ways besides conducting an improper search. Rights may be violated from performing an unjustified traffic stop (that subsequently leads to the discovery of controlled substances), by making false statements in order to obtain a warrant, or through the use of illegal wiretapping or eavesdropping. In all such cases the defendant may have grounds to suppress the evidence recovered as a result of the unconstitutional actions by the police. This means the evidence cannot be considered, typically leaving the prosecutor with no choice but to dismiss the charges.

Alternative Sentencing Programs for Drug Offenders

Prisons in the United States are badly overcrowded. Government data shows that a large proportion of prison inmates are serving time for non-violent drug offenses. The expense to the taxpayer associated with high incarceration rates has led to a lack of support for the status quo among the American public. As a result, those convicted of controlled substance offenses have new options available besides going to jail, especially when the alternative sentencing program can be made part of a voluntary plea agreement.

The most widely-used sentencing alternative is known as “drug court.” For participants who are genuinely interested in making meaningful changes in their lives and permanently committing to sobriety, drug court can be a successful experience. It usually consists of weekly group meetings, held in court and in front of the judge, but in a more relaxed atmosphere than formal criminal proceedings. Participants are rewarded with less supervision for staying clean, and can be immediately sent to jail as punishment for failed chemical tests, which are administered regularly.

Controlled Substance Law Attorneys

If you are facing criminal prosecution for a controlled substance violation, it is critical that you refrain from speaking any further with law enforcement, and that you seek help from an attorney right away. The law provides you with strong protections, but to take advantage you need an experienced attorney to advise you.

Copyright HG.org

 

Know Your Rights!

Articles About Controlled Substances Law

  • Drug Abuse Laws in New Jersey
    There is an epidemic that the entire nation faces right now and New Jersey is a location that is also suffering.
  • Arlington Criminal Defense Attorneys Are Not Created Equal - Differences Between a Good & Poor Choice
    Regardless of the crime you have been accused of, it's important to your freedom, career, and reputation to choose a capable criminal defense attorney in Arlington. What most people fail to realize is that one defense lawyer may be good, while another may not reach the best possible result in a case. What's the difference, and what does a good criminal defense lawyer do that perhaps a poor criminal defense attorney doesn't?
  • Invokana Lawsuits Will Be Heard in Federal Court
    These lawsuits against the makers of the diabetes drug claim that it was the cause of their kidney failure.
  • What to Do When Facing Drug Charges
    If you are in danger of facing drug charges, you may face severe penalties and even a lengthy prison sentence. The best thing to do for your case is find a criminal defense lawyer as early as possible. They may be able to negotiate on your behalf and get you a lighter sentence before any formal charges are made against you.
  • How Mental Health Affects Custody
    Raising a child is a demanding and challenging endeavor. This can pose problems for parents who suffer from a mental illness.
  • Sixth Risperdal Lawsuit Settled After Several Large Jury Awards
    The plaintiff alleges that the drug Risperdal was responsible for his gynecomastia.
  • Xarelto Trials Set to Begin in February 2017
    All the lawsuits filed against the Xarelto manufacturers claim that they have suffered serious or life threatening side effects from the drug.
  • Search & Seizure Law: Exclusionary Rule Applies at Probation Hearing in Pennsylvania
    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dramatically re-interpreted search and seizure law for people who are serving sentences of probation or parole. In Commonwealth v. Arter, the Court ruled that “illegally-obtained evidence which is suppressed during criminal proceedings should likewise be suppressed during parole and probation revocation proceedings pursuant to Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
  • Can I Use Marijuana While on Probation or Parole in Colorado?
    Marijuana is a federal offense, but for residents of Colorado, Marijuana is legal medically and recreationally. So what are CO residents' rights in using Marijuana while on probation or parole? Check out this article by Denver Criminal Defense Attorney, Colin Bresee, to learn more.
  • Does Law Enforcement Need A Warrant To Search My House If I Am On Probation?
    An issue that frequently comes up when litigating motions to suppress in drug and weapons cases is whether the police or probation department need a search warrant to search the house of a someone who is on probation. Both the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions require law enforcement to get a search warrant before conducting a search of a residence. However, there are a few limited exceptions to this rule. Two of those exceptions apply to people who are on probation or parole.
  • All Criminal Law Articles

Controlled Substances Law - US

Organizations For Controlled Substances Law

Publications For Controlled Substances Law




Find a Lawyer

Find a Local Lawyer