How Do Unfair Compensation and Deceptive Trade Practices Intersect?
Provided by HG.org
The Fair Trade Commission Act has a connection with unfair compensation and deceptive trade practices both in business interactions and commercial success. When a business or individual harmed through these issues needs a remedy, he or she or the company may seek such through the courts with enhanced rights and possible positive conclusions in court.
Business litigation thrives on the low standards of proof and enhanced remedies afforded to companies seeking compensation or some form of conclusion to a case in the courtroom. These are the usual unfair and deceptive trade practices that the entity may use to end a claim. The FTC becomes involved when these intersect with both compensation and deception. Various states around the country have enacted laws to counter these possible acts by companies since 1967 in Massachusetts as the first. By prohibiting the unfair methods to competition and unfair or deception in various acts and practices, the states may ensure that the plaintiff is awarded damages and any lawyer fees for the case.
Unfair Compensation and Competition
The chapters of laws create a binding legal decision against those practicing unfair and deceptive activity in court. When the defending party is willful or knows this activity occurs, the plaintiff could receive a mandatory award that often is double the standard amount in damages. This is possible through state laws. However, federal courts may increase or decrease any compensation awarded through these incidents. Unfair compensation occurs when the business receives more than it should in the case or has used deception to manipulate the courtroom into providing the funds. Through unreasonable competition, the entity may increase revenue and affect various companies around the state and country.
Targeting other companies through false information, unfair marketing campaigns used to detract business from other entities and by spreading reviews and comments online about the negative aspects of one company, unfair competition exists. Through these acts, the business may face legal complications for criminal activity.
Additionally, if defamation spreads, the target may seek litigation remedies for a cease and desist or compensation in the lawsuit for all lost revenue based on such defamation acts. These deceptive practices harm business, destabilize the local and state markets and could lead to economic disaster. It is important for the affected company to seek legal remedies through a lawyer quickly.
Deceptive Trade Explained
Similar to unfair competition activity, deceptive trade is when the company engages in behavior that detracts from business of a company. The owner or management uses various tactics to lure and mislead the consumer from purchasing products and services from the entity targeted. This often occurs when the entity is in the same industry or in direct competition for the same revenue. By misdirecting sales away from the company, it is possible to engage in illegal actions. Additionally, the company affected may seek compensation through a lawsuit. In many states, the acts of the company harming the entity end in automatic compensation and damages owed to the target.
Deceptive trade and unfair competition are part of the same tactics a company may use to cause the ruin of another business. However, when obtaining unfair compensation in the courtroom or in the company, these entities may go too far. Sometimes, these actions may lead to the need for legal interference. A private investigator could gather evidence, but the employees may need to engage in research to avoid implication into criminal charges or civil litigation if they become involved. The illegal defamation and misleading information about products and services could cause a company to lose all revenue eventually.
The Intersection of Unfair Compensation and Deceptive Trade
The same companies that engage in unfair competitive practices and deceptive trade also either compensate employees unfairly or seek litigation against individuals through unreasonable lawsuits. The intersection is where the company may go too far through legal action. Recourse against the entity is possible for these victims based on state laws that protect against these business practices. This may even include legal fees for lawyers and court costs. It is important to gather as much evidence as possible in these incidents to consult a lawyer about the issue.
Legal Support in Unfair Compensation and Deceptive Trade
After the consultation, the lawyer may determine there is enough strength in the case to pursue legal action against the company. Then, it is important to protect the rights of the client and seek as much compensation as possible from the business.
Disclaimer: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer.