Intentional Interference with Economic Relationships and Unfair Competition

Website Provided by

When a company engages in intentional unfair competition practices that seek to redirect or alter an economic relationship that interferes with accruing revenue, the business may face serious charges and possible damages owed to the other entity. The company must prove that the business did knowingly engage in such behavior to harm incoming profits.

Intentional interference that has a connection to or related to unfair competition could lead to economic hardship, and the business affected may sue the other company or person that caused the problem. These either are torts or have an association with them. With the help of a lawyer, it is possible to seek a remedy or compensation for the hardship and financial problems that occur through the intentional actions of the person or entity. This could require communication with clients and other companies that buy or trade with the affected business. With legal representation, the company may resolve the matter and return to previous sales heights and relationships with clients.

Intentional Interference Explained

Many companies that engage in unfair competition may not know or have any awareness of what their actions do to another business. The directing of customer or clients to the sales of products or services by altering the perceptions of the public for one entity to theirs is not usually intentional. However, many violate the unfair competition rules and laws often with no regard if they meant to do so or not. Intentional interference, however, is the willful disregard and purposeful activity of misrepresenting, redirecting and harming another company through product and service information and sales. These situations may end in a lawsuit.

Proving Intention

When civil litigation occurs, the burden of proof shifts from the defendant to the plaintiff. In these instances where unfair competition occurs, the person choosing to litigate must prove that the defending company or person did intentionally interfere with the economic relationship another company has with clients or customers. Through evidence of defamation, intellectual property infringement and misleading or misdirecting customers and clients, the company may have everything necessary to demonstrate to the court that the other entity did commit wrongs and violations of IP protections or through unfair competition.

The proof requires a twofold operation. The plaintiff must prove the intention of willful actions against the company and an involvement in unfair competition. This would include any wrongful activity of legal matters where the competition performed or behaved in a manner that is counter to the legal regulations that govern competition between companies. An intentional event where the entity did cause economic problems for the other company may prove unfair competition and that the intention was purposeful and the company knew what occurred. Through legal support with a lawyer, the affected business may increase the chances of success.

The Wrongful Acts

Unfair competition practices often lead to a loss of income and revenue for a company or person. Proving intentional participation is less difficult when the economic relationship of the business changes from the actions of the other entity. It is important for the company to hire a lawyer to pursue the claim, and sometimes a swift remedy is more important than seeking compensation. Stopping the entity from continued intentional interference through unfair competition is critical in ending a freefall of revenue losses. The company has the burden of proof in demonstrating to the courtroom that the other business or person is responsible for the complication. Through legal representation, this is possible.

The legal rules in unfair competition may arise when proceeding with the case. The company affected may need to clearly demonstrate to the judge or jury that the other entity did misdirect consumers through misinformation, similar products or marketing campaigns targeting the company directly. Use of similar materials, intellectual property infringement and online reviews may all show the court that the entity engaged in intentional wrongful conduct. Any violations of regulations in unfair competition, defamation, fraud and offenses to professional standards will increase the strength of the case. Then, the chances of success increase significantly for the company affected by the unfair competition.

The Legal Claim for Intentional Interference and Unfair Competition

The lawyer hired for the unfair competition claim may need to prove a violation of legal rules in these matters. The loss of profits due to the direct actions of the other company may provide the evidence necessary. By working with the lawyer, the affected business may demonstrate how the actions and activity lead to intentional unfair competition.


Disclaimer: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer.

Find a Lawyer

Find a Local Lawyer