Controlled Substance Law
Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
What is Controlled Substance Law?
Controlled substance law consists of prohibitions against the unauthorized possession of drugs that the government has determined to be dangerous, habit-forming, or otherwise not appropriate for use without a prescription. Statutes setting forth these laws have been enacted at all levels of government, including most local municipalities. Violations can result in criminal fines and incarceration. The severity of the penalty in any given case is determined primarily by the quantity of controlled substances involved and whether the offender has past convictions for similar crimes.
At the federal level, Congress enacted the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in 1970 in an effort to categorize regulated drugs based on their potential for abuse, as well as the benefits they provide from a medical standpoint. States have enacted their own schedules in much the same fashion. Drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, and many other street and prescription drugs are placed within one of five “schedules.” The most harmful substances appear in Schedule I, and the rest appear in descending order accordingly.
By placing all controlled substances into schedules, legislatures can then enact criminal statutes that incorporate the schedules by reference. This avoids the need to list all substances covered by a particular law within the text of the law itself. It also provides a convenient means for updating drug laws within a jurisdiction all at once, as individual drugs can be added or removed from the schedules as necessary without the need to amend all the other drug laws. For example, in the year 2000, Congress added the date-rape drug “GHB” to Schedule I, thereby automatically making it illegal under every federal drug law that references that schedule.
Criminal Charges and Statutory Issues
While law enforcement agencies carry out the investigation and apprehension of alleged controlled substance law offenders, the prosecuting attorney will have the final say in charging decisions. This discretion is important because the same conduct can often form the basis for a variety of criminal charges and corresponding punishments. Consider a case in which the defendant is caught giving marijuana to an acquaintance. A prosecutor could potentially charge the case as simple possession, possession with intent to distribute, delivery, trafficking, conspiracy to commit trafficking, and so on.
Once the nature of the charges is known, the defendant and his or her attorney must carefully review the language of the criminal statute. The precise wording of the statute is extremely important. Each portion should be considered individually, and thought of as a separate element that the state must prove in order to convict. In addition to the identity and weight of the substance recovered from the defendant, there may be issues as to the defendant’s knowledge of the substance, or whether the substance was actually in the defendant’s control.
Fourth Amendment Concerns
The fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbids the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. Law enforcement can only intrude upon an individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy under narrow circumstances, especially when acting without a search warrant. Controlled substance cases almost always trigger search and seizure concerns because at some point in the investigation, officers will be invading the suspect’s privacy in order to locate and take possession of the drugs.
In fact, the government can violate a suspect’s fourth amendment rights in a number of ways besides conducting an improper search. Rights may be violated from performing an unjustified traffic stop (that subsequently leads to the discovery of controlled substances), by making false statements in order to obtain a warrant, or through the use of illegal wiretapping or eavesdropping. In all such cases the defendant may have grounds to suppress the evidence recovered as a result of the unconstitutional actions by the police. This means the evidence cannot be considered, typically leaving the prosecutor with no choice but to dismiss the charges.
Alternative Sentencing Programs for Drug Offenders
Prisons in the United States are badly overcrowded. Government data shows that a large proportion of prison inmates are serving time for non-violent drug offenses. The expense to the taxpayer associated with high incarceration rates has led to a lack of support for the status quo among the American public. As a result, those convicted of controlled substance offenses have new options available besides going to jail, especially when the alternative sentencing program can be made part of a voluntary plea agreement.
The most widely-used sentencing alternative is known as “drug court.” For participants who are genuinely interested in making meaningful changes in their lives and permanently committing to sobriety, drug court can be a successful experience. It usually consists of weekly group meetings, held in court and in front of the judge, but in a more relaxed atmosphere than formal criminal proceedings. Participants are rewarded with less supervision for staying clean, and can be immediately sent to jail as punishment for failed chemical tests, which are administered regularly.
Controlled Substance Law Attorneys
If you are facing criminal prosecution for a controlled substance violation, it is critical that you refrain from speaking any further with law enforcement, and that you seek help from an attorney right away. The law provides you with strong protections, but to take advantage you need an experienced attorney to advise you.
Know Your Rights!
Articles About Controlled Substances Law
- Proton Pump Inhibitors Linked to Higher Risk of DeathStudies conducted have suggested that the risk of death has increased due to some heartburn drugs.
- Yaz Settlement Recipients the Target of Green Dot Debit Card ScamClaiming to be from a settlement center, con-artists tell Yaz victims to send money to receive their settlements back.
- Johnson & Johnson Appeals $48 Million Verdict Awarded in Motrin CaseThe company is claiming that Motrin is not dangerous and cannot be held liable for failing to warn consumers.
- Possession Issues in Drug and Marijuana CasesPossession of drugs and marijuana charges are common. University students are often common targets of the police, as well. There are some aspects of possession cases that all defense lawyers should consider.
- AbbVie Hit With $15 Million Jury Verdict in Depakote Spina Bifida CasePlaintiff claims the child’s spina bifida was due to his mother taking Depakote during her pregnancy.
- Xarelto Makers Failure to Warn of an Allegedly Known RiskAttorneys for the victims claim that Janssen and Bayer concealed information on the label.
- Clinical Trials Link Invokana to Amputation RiskThe FDA is ordering Johnson & Johnson to add a boxed warning regarding these clinical trials.
- Drug Abuse Laws in New JerseyThere is an epidemic that the entire nation faces right now and New Jersey is a location that is also suffering.
- Arlington Criminal Defense Attorneys Are Not Created Equal - Differences Between a Good & Poor ChoiceRegardless of the crime you have been accused of, it's important to your freedom, career, and reputation to choose a capable criminal defense attorney in Arlington. What most people fail to realize is that one defense lawyer may be good, while another may not reach the best possible result in a case. What's the difference, and what does a good criminal defense lawyer do that perhaps a poor criminal defense attorney doesn't?
- Invokana Lawsuits Will Be Heard in Federal CourtThese lawsuits against the makers of the diabetes drug claim that it was the cause of their kidney failure.
- All Criminal Law Articles
Controlled Substances Law - US
- ABA - Standing Committee on Substance Abuse
The mission of the Standing Committee on Substance Abuse is to encourage bar associations to actively develop and foster lawyer and public participation in community anti-drug coalitions as an effective means of addressing substance abuse.
- Alcohol and Controlled Substances Testing
Most drivers of commercial motor vehicles (CMV) engaged in interstate and intrastate transportation are subject to controlled substances and alcohol testing under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations found in 49 CFR, Part 382.
- Alcohol, Tobacco, and Controlled Substances - Overview
Health and other public concerns have generated detailed Federal and state regulation of the sale and possession of alcoholic beverages, tobacco products, and a wide range of other "controlled substances."
- Controlled Substance Schedules
This document is a general reference and not a comprehensive list. This list describes the basic or parent chemical and does not describe the salts, isomers and salts of isomers, esters, ethers and derivatives which may also be controlled substances
- Controlled Substances Act
The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) was enacted into law by the Congress of the United States as Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970.
- Controlled Substances Import and Export Act
Rules on the import and export of controlled substances to and from the United States.
- Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
- Federal Marijuana Law - ASA
The federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (21 U.S.C. § 811), which does not recognize the difference between medical and recreational use of marijuana. These laws are generally applied only against persons who possess, cultivate, or distribute large quantities of marijuana.
- International Narcotics Control Board (INCB)
- National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI)
SAMHSA's National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI) is the Nation's one-stop resource for information about substance abuse prevention and addiction treatment.
- National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC)
The NDIC, a component of the U.S. Department of Justice, is the Nation’s principal center for strategic domestic counter-drug intelligence. Its mission, in part, is to produce national, regional, and State drug threat assessments.
- National Survey on Drug Use and Health
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), formerly the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), measures the prevalence of drug and alcohol use among household members age 12 and older.
- State Controlled Substance Acts - CCLE
Full text on controlled substance laws in all states in the U.S.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)
SAMHDA's purpose is to increase the utilization of substance abuse and mental health databases, thereby encouraging their use to understand and assess the extent of alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health disorders and the nature and impact of related treatment systems.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
- United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
DA is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services1 and consists of centers and offices, which are listed in menu at left.
Organizations For Controlled Substances Law
- Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA)
- Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN)
- Drug Policy Alliance Network (DPA Network)
- Drug-Free Communities Program
- Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD)
- National Association of State Controlled Substances Authorities (NASCSA)
- National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)
- Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (OSDFS)
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
- The National Association for Addiction Professionals